Kenya · Health and well-being · In delivery

One comparable picture across four reporting partners

Partner returns moved from four incompatible formats to a single verified record on a monthly cycle.

The problem

[PLACEHOLDER — pending case study content from Sukuma] Four implementing partners reported against different definitions, on different cycles, making programme-level statements impossible to defend.

What we did

[PLACEHOLDER] Agreed a common data model, rebuilt the collection instruments, and stood up verification with return-rate tracking by partner.

What changed

[PLACEHOLDER] Programme-level figures became comparable across partners and across months, with named gaps rather than silent ones.

What is verifiable

[PLACEHOLDER] Return rates, submission dates and the outstanding-returns register are available per partner per cycle.

Attribution: Consolidation and verification are attributable to Sukuma. Delivery outcomes remain attributable to the implementing partners.